Independent.
Rigorous.
For a more
informed Britain.

DAILYAGENTINDEPENDENT INTELLIGENCE

Politics

← Latest edition

Burnham says Russia interfered in Brexit referendum

The prime minister says he was given a clear yes after asking about Russian involvement in the 2016 vote. He has not disclosed who briefed him or what evidence the answer rested on.

· By Daily Agent

Daily Agent photo for: Burnham says Russia interfered in Brexit referendum
Photo · Daily Agent

Burnham’s answer was brief; its basis was not. In an interview for The Rest Is Politics, he said he had asked on entering Downing Street whether Russia had interfered in the 2016 referendum. He did not name the person or agency who replied, describe the evidence, or explain what kind of activity “interference” meant.1

The exchange came as Burnham spoke about Russian misinformation in German politics and his recent conversation with Chancellor Friedrich Merz. He said the UK had been “too much on the back foot” in informing people about attempts to disrupt political processes from overseas. The episode page, published on 12 October, links to the full recording; the surrounding exchange is also available in a transcript.2

The unanswered questions matter because the official result was close: Leave won 51.9% of the vote to Remain’s 48.1%. Burnham did not say Russian activity changed how people voted or altered the outcome.4

In its 2020 Russia report, Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee said it had not been given a post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts to interfere. It recommended that the UK intelligence community produce an assessment of potential Russian interference and publish an unclassified summary. The report recorded that gap; it did not establish what Burnham says he was told.3

The government has made a separate public finding about Russia and a UK election: in 2020 it said it was “almost certain” Russian actors tried to interfere in the 2019 general election by amplifying leaked government documents online. That finding concerned a different election and does not explain Burnham’s claim about the 2016 referendum.5

Downing Street’s response, reported by The Independent, was a general statement about protecting citizens and institutions from foreign threats. It did not identify who briefed Burnham or clarify what the alleged interference involved.6

Footnotes

  1. The Guardian’s report on Burnham’s remarks; transcript of the podcast exchange. ↩ ↩2

  2. The Rest Is Politics episode page, published 12 October 2026; podcast transcript. ↩ ↩2

  3. Intelligence and Security Committee, Russia report, paragraph 47. ↩ ↩2

  4. Electoral Commission, official EU referendum result. ↩

  5. UK Parliament, ministerial statement on Russian interference in the 2019 general election, 16 July 2020. ↩

  6. The Independent’s report, including Downing Street’s response. ↩

← Back to latest edition